TRENTON, N.J. — New Jersey's Bureau of Securities opened its annual examination of investment advisers this week with a scope that looks routine on paper and carries weight in context. The 2026 review demands answers from nearly 800 registered firms about how they use artificial intelligence to build portfolios, market services and protect client data. The 22-day compliance window runs from June 8 to June 30.

Attorney General Jennifer Davenport announced the examination on June 8 alongside Bureau of Securities chief Keith Alt and Consumer Affairs acting director Jeremy Hollander. Davenport said that New Jersey families "work hard to make ends meet and build financial security" and that the bureau must ensure firms "are operating responsibly and safeguarding client information." Alt and Hollander framed the review around transparency and investor protection, with Alt saying the examination would help identify emerging issues and Hollander calling it a cornerstone of investor protection that lets regulators address potentially disruptive practices before they harm investors.

The press release did not mention the federal executive order on AI innovation and security that President Trump signed six days earlier. It did not mention the Securities and Exchange Commission's 2026 examination priorities, released in November, which treat AI as a risk topic for oversight. The state's announcement, just six days after the White House's but silent on the federal angle, is notable for what it reveals about the relationship between state and federal government.

While the state action begins, the federal one slows. The White House had previously directed the Commerce Department to evaluate 'onerous' state AI laws by March 11. The department has not released that evaluation. The White House also directed the Federal Trade Commission to issue a policy statement on deceptive AI practices by the same date. That commission has not released their statement either. The Federal Communications Commission was directed to initiate a preemption proceeding within 90 days of the Commerce evaluation, a deadline that has not been triggered because the Commerce report is still pending.

The federal order aims to stop state-specific AI legislation. The Department of Justice has publicly intervened in only one known case, challenging a Colorado AI statute, but has not targeted New Jersey's examination authority. New Jersey has no equivalent law. Its examination relies on the Uniform Securities Law and general securities supervision authority. Those statutes are older and broader. It is less clear how the order blocks a state from asking investment advisers about their cybersecurity practices.

The SEC under Chair Paul Atkins has taken a different posture. Atkins told Congress in May 2025 that the agency's offices and divisions had "decreased headcount by 15% since the beginning of the current fiscal year." The commission's 2026 examination priorities list AI as a focus area and state that examiners will assess whether firms' operations and controls align with regulatory obligations. The SEC's posture is dialogue-oriented, while New Jersey's examination carries specific penalties and a hard deadline.

The federal preemption threat is real but has stalled. A 291-page federal discussion draft released in March by Senator Marsha Blackburn (R, Tenn.) would repeal or substantially reform Section 230 and create a limited federal preemption framework but explicitly preserve "generally applicable law." That language would protect the Uniform Securities Law and other generally applicable state statutes, including the Consumer Fraud Act and Law Against Discrimination. The bill is a discussion draft, not introduced legislation.

The state Bureau of Securities's capacity to evaluate machine learning outputs may be limited, but its ability to penalize non-compliance is less so. Firms that fail to respond by June 30 face deficiency letters, potential termination of registration and civil penalties under state law of $10,000 for a first offense and $20,000 for a second. The examination probes how firms document their cybersecurity rules, train staff on those rules, and vet outside vendors. It does not ask for model weights, training data or algorithmic fairness metrics.

The examination is entirely digital and requires online submission. The press release does not say whether incomplete answers trigger deficiency letters or whether the AI disclosures will be used in future enforcement. The bureau examined "nearly 900" investment advisers in 2024 and "nearly 800" in 2025 and 2026. The bureau has not publicly explained the drop to roughly 800 firms.

No public statements from investment advisers or associations appeared in searches as of June 11. The silence may reflect the examination's routine annual character, or it may simply be too soon for industry responses.

Davenport's office framed the examination as investor protection. The announcement did not mention federal oversight gaps or SEC coordination. The SEC offered no public comment. The two regulators are operating on parallel tracks.

Davenport has maintained the litigation portfolio she inherited from former Attorney General Matthew Platkin, with active cases in state court, including one that survived a Section 230 dismissal motion. She has filed no new platform cases and has kept existing ones open. In May she joined 43 other attorneys general in opposing the Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act, arguing that the bill's preemption provisions would "gut state consumer protection law." She signed a coalition letter supporting the Kids Online Safety Act in February. The examination is her first AI-related action with mandatory compliance consequences for a regulated industry.

The examination closes June 30. After that, the only question is which of the 800 firms pays, and how much.

Related Articles

• New Jersey AG Davenport Joins State Coalition on Rental Junk Fees

• Davenport Sues Trump as NJ Primary Opens — Federal Hearing Set for Election Day

• NJ Leads Nation in Federal Collections, Fueled by Blockbuster TD Bank Case

Sources

• NJ Attorney General's Office, press release, "Attorney General Davenport, Bureau of Securities and Consumer Affairs Announce Annual Investment Adviser Examination" (June 8, 2026)

• NJ Division of Consumer Affairs, press release, "Division of Consumer Affairs and Bureau of Securities Announce Annual Investment Adviser Examination" (May 13, 2024)

• NJ Division of Consumer Affairs, press release, "Division of Consumer Affairs and Bureau of Securities Announce Annual Investment Adviser Examination" (June 4, 2025)

• Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Press Release, "SEC Announces 2026 Examination Priorities" (November 2025)

• Paul Atkins, SEC Chair, testimony before U.S. House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government (May 20, 2025)

• The White House, Presidential Actions, "Executive Order on Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education and Literacy for America's Youth" (June 2, 2026)

• The White House, Presidential Actions, "Executive Order on Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence" (December 11, 2025)

• The White House, Fact Sheet, "President Trump Takes Action to Secure American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence" (June 2, 2026)

• Pam Bondi, Attorney General, Department of Justice, "The Attorney General Artificial Intelligence Litigation Task Force" (January 9, 2026)

• U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, xAI challenge to Colorado SB 24-205, federal stay order (April 2026)

• Colorado General Assembly, SB 24-205, Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (2024)

• New Jersey Legislature, N.J.S.A. 49:3-47 to -83, New Jersey Uniform Securities Law (1967)

• New Jersey Legislature, N.J.S.A. 49:3-70.1, Civil Penalties under Uniform Securities Law

• New Jersey Legislature, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1, New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (1960)

• New Jersey Legislature, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1, New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (1945)

• NJ Attorney General's Office, press release, "Attorney General Davenport and Coalition of 44 Attorneys General Oppose KIDS Act" (May 26, 2026)

• National Association of Attorneys General, NAAG Press Release, "Coalition of Attorneys General Urge Congress to Pass Kids Online Safety Act" (February 2026)

• Senator Marsha Blackburn (R, Tenn.), Office of Senator Marsha Blackburn, "Blackburn Unveils TRUMP AMERICA AI Act" (March 18, 2026)

• WRNJ Radio, "New Jersey securities regulators to focus on AI, cybersecurity in annual adviser examinations" (June 8, 2026)

• Law360, "NJ Securities Regulators to Focus on AI in Annual Adviser Exams" (June 8, 2026)

• NJ Attorney General's Office, press release, "Attorney General Platkin Files Lawsuit Against Meta Platforms" (October 2023)

• NJ Attorney General's Office, press release, "Attorney General Platkin Files Lawsuit Against TikTok" (October 2024)

• NJ Attorney General's Office, press release, "Attorney General Platkin Files Lawsuit Against Discord" (April 2025)

• Essex County Superior Court, State of New Jersey v. TikTok, Judge Lisa Adubato ruling on Section 230 motion (September 2025)